Stop the Early Surrenders in Smite: Why Patience is the Real MVP

by

Discussing Smite, the well-known MOBA that incorporates gods into its competitive gameplay, has turned out to be a testing ground not just for divine characters but also for players’ tolerance. A current topic of conversation within the Smite community has ignited quite a disagreement over early surrenders, with one player expressing disappointment that the number of “F6s” – an abbreviation for players opting to surrender before the game has even reached the halfway mark – has become excessively aggravating. It seems many players are adopting the philosophy “if at first you don’t succeed, just tap the surrender button!” instead of persevering through hardships. This discussion delves into the feelings and motivations driving the urge to give up prematurely, encouraging players to rethink their strategies for a more enjoyable gaming journey.

Summary

  • The urge to surrender in Smite often arises from frustration, particularly in the face of early deaths or poor team synergy.
  • Some players argue that surrendering might sometimes be best when stuck with an underperforming teammate or overwhelming odds.
  • Discussion highlights the importance of patience and learning from losses rather than abandoning ship at the first sign of trouble.
  • Players express a mix of empathy and frustration, acknowledging the difficulty of balancing fun with competitiveness.

Early Surrenders: A New Epidemic?

It’s hard not to empathize with players who concede early in games, as nobody likes the long, disheartening trudge towards defeat. It reminds one of a balloon at a clown’s sad birthday party – deflated and demoralized. Themris’ post highlights that many players often give up too easily, especially against strategies that apply heavy pressure early on, such as a damage-focused support or an aggressive assassin like Loki who thrives on early kills. Some players may find themselves overwhelmed by this frustration, thinking it’s wiser to abandon the fight and surrender. However, many other players argue for the value of perseverance. For instance, user DoomOfGods recounts a match where their team surrendered at level 6 after just one lost skirmish, despite being 10,000 gold ahead. It’s evident that many players have felt the agony of an early surrender when victory was still attainable. The tension is palpable as these players often choose to learn from their experiences rather than conceding defeat immediately.

The Psychology Behind Surrendering

The heart of the debate about giving up centers around a deep-seated urge to avoid suffering. If a player finds themselves trailing 0-10 in the early stages of the game, it’s reasonable they’d want to steer clear of an impending loss. However, this strategy to dodge pain might trap the player in a loop of growing discontent and hinder their development as a gamer. ZehGentleman puts it this way: “If you’re down 10k and two lanes are 0-10 early on, it could be wise to withdraw.” This idea resonates with the ancient wisdom that sometimes, prudence is wiser than courage, particularly when confronted with such unfavorable circumstances.

But things get more intricate in this discussion, as Miss__Behaved shares her journey from advocating for early surrenders to favoring perseverance. She now believes that winning as a 4v5 is less challenging than extending a game with an unrelentingly feeding teammate. The art of knowing when to hold on tight and when to let go becomes crucial in navigating the emotional terrain of competitive matches.

Addressing Toxicity & Team Chemistry

The persistent issue of toxicity, which can seep in, frequently intensifies the difficulty of dealing with early departures.

Read More

2025-01-29 13:58