Will Smite 2 Tackle AFK Players? Community Weighs In!

by

In the world of gaming, Smite – the popular MOBA known for its epic 5v5 god versus god battles – stands at a critical juncture. The imminent arrival of Smite 2 has fans eager with anticipation for enhancements, but an age-old adversary casts a shadow: AFK players. The gaming community is abuzz with worries that if the developers don’t address this issue promptly, it might resurrect the annoying experiences from the original game. A post by user TheJumboman has sparked conversation, emphasizing the need to foster a culture where players complete their matches, even during challenging times. The debate has grown into a diverse assortment of viewpoints, with some arguing for tough penalties against chronic AFK offenders and others offering empathy towards those grappling with real-world distractions. Let’s delve deeper into the Smite 2 community’s thoughts on the AFK predicament!

If smite2 doesn’t deal with AFK’s from day 1 it’s gonna end up just like smite1
byu/TheJumboman inSmite

Summary

  • The concerns over AFK players stem from previous experiences in Smite 1, where players sometimes didn’t face consequences for leaving matches prematurely.
  • Users propose solutions similar to those used in other games, like tiered penalties for repeated AFK infractions.
  • There’s a distinct split in sentiment, with some advocating for strict punishment and others urging leniency for occasional disconnects.
  • The community emphasizes the importance of game integrity and the need for a robust reporting system.

The Frustration of AFK Players

It’s clear that players who leave a game (AFK) during competitive online games, including Smite, can cause frustration. Many players have been known to exit the game when things don’t go their way, leading to a lot of annoyance among other players. A post by TheJumboman expresses this feeling, urging against the growing acceptance of quitting a match as soon as the situation turns unfavorable for a player. One user aptly summarized this issue by saying that it’s easy to spot when someone is going to quit in anger, indicating there’s no confusion about whether it’s due to technical problems or cowardice. Many players agree that developers should address this problem quickly to prevent more dissatisfied players from leaving the community.

Balancing Punishment and Compassion

In the competitive world of online battle royales, where sudden real-life interruptions might cause players to leave games without warning (AFK), there’s ongoing discussion about what fair penalties should be applied. User devynnnnnnnnnn suggests a system similar to League of Legends, where the first instance of AFK results in a brief timeout, and subsequent occurrences lead to progressively longer sanctions. This method shows understanding for unintentional offenses while keeping repeat violators in check. Other players agree, noting that this is a problem shared by all Multiplayer Online Battle Arenas (MOBA). They believe stronger reporting mechanisms could help distinguish accidental disconnects from deliberate rage-quitting. No one wants their team to be disadvantaged due to someone genuinely losing their connection, particularly during critical matches.

Real Life vs. Gaming Commitment

User SliceOfTy humorously describes his multitasking role as a father of four, juggling diaper changes with intense gaming sessions in Smite. He advocates for an enhanced timing and notification system in Smite 2 to prevent him from being unfairly penalized for legitimate interruptions, such as tending to his children. His perspective sheds light on the broader discussion about balancing real-life commitments with gaming passion. If the game can sensitively address these challenges while maintaining its competitive nature, it could cultivate a more understanding player community, thereby preserving the game’s integrity.

Team Dynamics and the F6 Dilemma

The community is filled with varying views on when it’s acceptable to concede, similar to the controversial F6 (forfeit) move. User Taboe44 openly discusses instances where a game seems unwinnable, suggesting that at times it’s a respectful act to save everyone’s time by ending the match early and moving onto the next one. On the other hand, BiggestIT brings up the idea that frequent users of the F7 option (quit) may not value their teammates or the invested time in joint gaming sessions. This raises an important debate: should the community adopt this mindset or strive to keep players involved, even during losing matches? Striking a proper balance can significantly influence future gameplay and potentially decrease AFK rates among those who aim to minimize wasted time in seemingly unbeatable situations.

In discussions about AFK players in Smite 2, it’s clear that the community is highly engaged with the game, eager to ensure its prosperity. They are particularly committed to avoiding past issues, yet they also acknowledge the complexities of real life that may unexpectedly arise. Players understand that everyone encounters unforeseen circumstances now and then, and while responsibility is essential, empathy is equally important.

This interaction showcases a thriving community willing to collaborate with developers to create a rewarding gaming atmosphere where completing matches is more common than rare. Maintaining this balance can be tricky, but if Smite 2 effectively tackles the AFK issue from the get-go, we could potentially enter a gaming paradise characterized by personal responsibility alongside the thrilling ups and downs of teaming up with gods in battle. Here’s to hoping the gods bestow us with a reliable solution!

Read More

2025-01-22 23:59