Why Players Say ‘Forget the Good Ending’ in Call of Duty: BO2

by

Discussions about Call of Duty have always been passionate, particularly concerning its storylines and conclusions. A recent example is a post titled “Forget striving for the ideal ending, it’s just not worth it,” where players discuss their feelings about the apparent pointlessness of pursuing the desired climax in Call of Duty: Black Ops II. They shared their personal tales and frustrations regarding the game’s multiple endings, many agreeing that the effort required to unlock the “good ending” is often excessive and unnecessary. The overall sentiment suggests that enjoying the game is more important than the struggle to achieve a particular result.

Summary

  • Many players find the effort required for the good ending frustrating and unnecessary.
  • Strike Force missions receive mixed reviews, with some enjoying the challenge while others find them a chore.
  • The prevailing sentiment suggests that players may focus on the experience rather than the outcome.
  • Some believe that Black Ops II’s campaign isn’t worthy of being labeled the best in the series.

The Value of the Good Ending

In Black Ops II, some gamers put in a lot of effort to reach what’s known as the “good ending,” but many argue that this endeavor is not worth the time invested. This discussion raises an intriguing question: when does a game transition from being enjoyable to becoming a challenge? A user named NIDORAX expresses a viewpoint that strikes a chord with several others: “The good ending isn’t canonical anyway.” This statement encapsulates why some gamers feel drained after pursuing a specific narrative outcome. They find it disheartening when the story can take unexpected turns that they may not appreciate. When gameplay becomes tedious, it’s no surprise that players might decide to forgo their search for a tidy ending and instead embrace the game’s inherent disorder.

Strike Force Missions: Love Them or Hate Them?

Discussions about Black Ops II’s campaign often revolve around the Strike Force missions, a new gameplay aspect that has sparked varying opinions among players. Some find these missions exhilarating and a welcome change from the traditional linear campaign, while others view them as an annoying hurdle that detracts from the enjoyment of the storyline. Eklipse-gg’s comment encapsulates this divide: “The Strike Force mission grind is brutal, but the good ending makes it worthwhile for some, not all.” This sentiment resonates with those who either appreciate these missions as a novelty or find them an unnecessary challenge in appreciating the story. For many players, it’s a dilemma of wanting to experience something engaging yet finding an additional layer of difficulty that makes achieving it more laborious than desired.

BrilliantFennel277’s comment, “I thought Strike Force was easy on veteran ngl,” suggests a humorous perspective. This person appears to have confidently faced the game’s difficulty without much struggle! Yet, it’s evident that gamers’ experiences can greatly differ when tackling challenges. Some players seem unfazed by seemingly insurmountable odds, while others prefer a smoother ride through the storyline without excessive obstacles. This disparity often means that the narrative takes a backseat to the gameplay experience for many players.

Gaming for Fun vs. Achievements

fun should always come first.

In the world of gaming, it’s common for players to overlook the fact that they should primarily be amused, not stressed out. Choosing less challenging modes allows players to shed their competitive spirit and instead appreciate the intricacies of the plot and gameplay. This sentiment echoes with those who feel constrained by an outdated notion that gaming prowess is measured by accomplishments or awards. Modern gamers, as evidenced by numerous comments, are pushing for experiences centered around fun.

Questioning the Title of “Best Campaign”

Among gamers discussing whether Black Ops II truly measures up to its acclaimed status within the Call of Duty series, there’s a large group expressing doubts about the game’s top-tier reputation. playerlsaysr69 flatly states, “This is why BO2 isn’t considered to have the finest campaign and doesn’t deserve to be called the best.” This sparks debate on how individual opinions on gaming stories can vary greatly. The appeal or effectiveness of a campaign can fluctuate like a swinging pendulum, influenced by players’ unique experiences and expectations.

The differing opinions about the endings of Black Ops II highlight the diverse experiences players can have while progressing through its campaign. Is it notable for its suspenseful moments or merely another repetitive addition to the series? This uncertainty casts doubt on whether it truly deserves the title of “best campaign.” Instead, it seems that a significant number of gamers prefer an engaging and satisfying experience over a flawless one.

Discussing the final act in Black Ops II shows a small reflection of modern gaming society’s trends. Gamers are now leaning towards experiencing enjoyment rather than being consumed by tough achievements. Instead, they value rich storytelling and character development more than amassing titles or awards. This shift is evident in choosing an easier mode, playing Strike Force missions with a relaxed approach, or even debating what truly defines a great campaign. These discussions point to shifting perspectives among gamers. What’s emerging isn’t just a vibrant debate but a guide for future gaming: when faced with uncertainty, prioritize fun, welcome disorder, and remember that sometimes, letting the good ending pass is perfectly fine.

Read More

2025-01-07 23:43