Texas vs. Arizona State Results according to College Football 25

by

As a die-hard Texas Longhorns fan who’s seen more games than I care to remember, this Chik-Fil-A Peach Bowl matchup against Arizona State Sun Devils has me buzzing with excitement! The Longhorns have been on fire this season, and their victory over Clemson last week was just the icing on the cake.

This week’s College Football 25 matchup features the Texas Longhorns taking on the Arizona State Sun Devils in the Chick-fil-A Peach Bowl, as we move into the second round of the playoffs next week. The Longhorns emerged victorious over Clemson last week with a score of 38-24, while ASU had a bye week. With only one team able to progress to the Cotton Bowl, let’s see who will come out on top in this exciting clash.

Texas Longhorns vs. Arizona State University Sun Devils results according to College Football 25

Based on College Football 25 predictions, Texas is expected to emerge victorious against Arizona State with a score of 36-8, thereby qualifying for the College Football Playoff Semi-Finals. Initially, both teams struggled, but Texas took control by the end of the second quarter. In the remaining three quarters, they scored an impressive 36 points without reply, overwhelming ASU and securing their place in the next round.

TEAM1st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th QuarterFINAL
#5 TEX01415736
#4 ASU23038

For much of the initial half, Texas Longhorns’ offense found it challenging. Despite Arizona State not scoring in a fourth-down attempt at the end zone, they still managed to score when they forced a safety instead. To add to their tally, they also kicked a field goal, making it 5-0.

Towards the conclusion of the first half, Texas’ quarterback, Quinn Ewers, effortlessly launched passes that traveled over 25 yards. In the last two minutes alone, he tossed two touchdowns, which put Texas ahead thanks to his contributions.

In the second half, our team’s offense really took flight, scoring another two touchdown passes from Ewers. We even managed to pull off a successful two-point conversion, making it 29-5 at the end of the third quarter. And Texas sealed the deal with a 6-yard touchdown run by Quintrevion Wisner, effectively ending the game. What an exciting match!

ASU finally put some points up on the board in garbage time. However, they failed to score a touchdown all day as they watch Texas advance to the Cotton Bowl. With the win, the Longhorns will face either the Ohio State Buckeyes or Oregon Ducks. Either team poses a serious threat to Texas’ playoff run.

For Arizona State University (ASU), the major challenge lay in the scarcity of effective ground attack. Cam Skattebo managed only 18 yards from 14 carries, and as the game progressed, ASU was forced to forsake the running game in a desperate attempt to turn the tide. Additionally, their defense struggled to maintain their early successes in making crucial stops.

Scoring Summary

First Quarter:

  • ASU – Team Safety, 0:58 (ASU 2-0)

Second Quarter:

  • ASU – Ian Hershey, 44 Yd FG, 10:15 (ASU 5-0)
  • TEX – Isaiah Bond 28 Yd pass from Quinn Ewers (Bert Auburn Kick), 3:54 (TEX 7-5)
  • TEX – Matthew Golden 26 Yd pass from Quinn Ewers (Bert Auburn Kick), 1:55 (TEX 14-5)

Third Quarter:

  • TEX – Amari Niblack 21 Yd pass from Quinn Ewers. Gunnar Helm (2-Point Conversion), 10:11 (TEX 22-5)
  • TEX – Jaydon Blue 16 Yd pass from Quinn Ewers (Bert Auburn Kick), 5:14 (TEX 29-5)

Fourth Quarter:

  • TEX – Quintrevion Wisner, 6 Yd run (Bert Auburn kick), 5:42 (TEX 36-5)
  • ASU – Ian Hershey, 41 Yd FG, 1:49 (TEX 36-8)

In summary, here are the findings from our comparison between Texas and Arizona State, as per College Football Ranking No. 25. We trust you had a great time watching, so keep an eye out for additional matches in the future.

It appears that, despite adjusting CPU and Player settings, CPU vs. CPU games don’t seem to reflect those changes as expected. Additionally, it seems these games are defaulting to the easiest setting, which is not what we intended. However, we remain committed to enhancing our simulations, with potential improvements ranging from, but not limited to:

Read More

2024-12-26 22:08