Vitalik’s Crypto Conundrum: Pay Your Users or Face the Grim Reaper?

by

Vitalik Buterin, the crypto wizard with a flair for profound thoughts and a penchant for digital magic, has had quite the chat about Ethereum apps. He’s waving his wand and proclaiming that these shiny new crypto applications must transcend the rather dubious “pay users or perish” model. This is not just a game of financial hide-and-seek, my dear friends; it’s about crafting something that’s actually useful and building a community that doesn’t resemble a ghost town once the money stops flowing.

  • Buterin, in all his wisdom, scoffs at the notion that “pay users or fail” is a growth strategy. Instead, he suggests a lovely little model where the revenue from some users gently funds the value for others-a bit like how traditional businesses work, but without the suits and the endless meetings about synergy.
  • He acknowledges that early rewards can be like a soothing balm for those brave souls-liquidity providers and early adopters-who venture into the wild west of smart contracts, hacks, and the occasional project failure. But, oh dear, these rewards should fade away faster than a magician’s rabbit as protocols mature and audits become as common as Tuesday.
  • Our dear Vitalik warns that the mystical arts of airdrops and social media payout schemes merely inflate metrics with activities that are less than genuine. Real adoption, he says, comes from apps that actually do things and from community members who aren’t just there to collect their shiny tokens.

In what can only be described as a digital soapbox moment, Ethereum’s co-founder threw himself into the ongoing debates swirling around the cryptocurrency cosmos, cautioning folks against leaning too heavily on financial incentives that could disappear faster than a chocolate bar in a room full of children.

Buterin’s Recent Online Rant: A Masterclass in Crypto Wisdom

In a recent online discussion on X (formerly known as Twitter, because who doesn’t love a good rebranding?), Buterin tackled the fiery claims that cryptocurrency applications simply cannot achieve any meaningful adoption without showering users with airdrops or token rewards. It was a debate as lively as a cat on a hot tin roof, centered around the question of whether financial payouts are absolutely essential for creating network effects in this bustling sector.

Buterin, ever the pragmatist, acknowledged that incentives are like weather patterns-they reflect current market conditions-but he vehemently warned against embracing the “pay users or fail” strategy. According to him, that would be akin to trying to catch smoke with a net.

In his infinite wisdom, Buterin distinguished between sustainable and unsustainable reward structures. Sustainable models are the golden geese-where revenue collected from users funds the happiness of others, spinning an economic loop reminiscent of the best kind of fairytale.

He did concede that paying users during the perilous early stages of a project might be okay in certain dire circumstances. After all, liquidity providers are akin to brave knights facing the dragons of potential hacks or project failures, and some rewards can act as compensation for their gallant risk-taking.

My first reaction to this was:

“And that’s why I just got my $2,725 check of fileverse tokens now that fileverse has grown to the point where my dad regularly writes docs in fileverse that he sends to me”

My second reaction to this was:

“I see how this makes total sense from a…

– vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) February 12, 2026

Buterin’s analysis proposes that once projects complete their audits and trust is established, the dragons of risk begin to dwindle, and those lavish rewards turn into nothing more than a distant memory.

He elaborated that simply throwing money at users to generate activity can lead to long-term sustainability issues akin to building a sandcastle at low tide. Teams may mistakenly think future profits will magically cover their initial expenditures, only to find that activity tends to plummet once the rewards dry up-because, let’s face it, many users were only in it for the free goodies.

According to our avant-garde oracle of Ethereum, aggressive reward campaigns can turn communities into shallow pools where the focus shifts from creating quality content to merely chasing the next payout. When the payments stop, so does the activity, leaving behind a digital wasteland.

Buterin made a clear distinction between decentralized finance applications and social platforms, suggesting that in DeFi, capital behaves uniformly, while on social platforms, the quality and engagement of active users outweigh sheer numbers like a heavy anchor in a small boat.

Committed community members often toil away, building tools, drafting documentation, and answering forum questions without expecting a shiny reward. These selfless contributions help fortify projects over time, making them as sturdy as a well-worn tome in a wizard’s library.

Effective incentives, he argued, should merely offset the temporary weaknesses of early-stage products and then gracefully bow out as those weaknesses diminish, avoiding the trap of creating an illusion of adoption while neglecting the nurturing of genuine communities.

“The bulk of the effort should be on making an actually useful app,” Buterin asserted, with a tone that suggested he might have a few scrolls of wisdom hidden away. “This was historically ignored because it wasn’t necessary for narrative engineering to create a speculative bubble. But now it is necessary,” he quipped, likely imagining a few raised eyebrows at the thought.

In conclusion, our beloved Ethereum co-founder contends that the cryptocurrency sector is slowly but surely moving towards a paradigm driven by real utility rather than rewards-a trend that’s as refreshing as a cool breeze in a crowded tavern. Strong incentive structures should compensate for the early hiccups and naturally phase out as projects reach maturity, much like the inevitable end of a particularly raucous party.

Read More

2026-02-13 14:35