Can AI Truly Hear? Testing Audio Models in the Real World

by

Author: Denis Avetisyan

A new benchmark reveals that current audio AI struggles with the complexities of everyday sound, often performing worse with common noise reduction techniques.

RSA-Bench assesses the robustness of Audio Large Models across diverse acoustic scenarios, highlighting limitations in real-world performance.

Despite recent advances, Audio Large Models (ALLMs) exhibit brittle robustness when deployed in realistic acoustic environments. To address this, we introduce RSA-Bench: Benchmarking Audio Large Models in Real-World Acoustic Scenarios, a novel benchmark employing high-fidelity auditory scene simulations to stress-test ALLMs across six core tasks. Our findings reveal a significant performance gap between low-level perception and high-order reasoning under acoustic stress, alongside a surprising result: standard speech enhancement techniques often degrade performance due to semantic distortions. Will future ALLMs require fundamentally new architectures to truly navigate the complexities of real-world sound?

The Illusion of Auditory Mastery

Audio Large Models (ALLMs) represent a significant leap in sound processing, demonstrating impressive capabilities in tasks like speech recognition and sound event detection. However, these models frequently falter when confronted with the messy realities of everyday audio. Unlike the clean, curated datasets used during training, real-world recordings are often riddled with background noise, overlapping sounds, reverberation, and variations in recording quality. This discrepancy between training and deployment environments exposes a critical limitation: ALLMs, despite their size and sophistication, struggle to generalize beyond idealized conditions. The models exhibit reduced accuracy and increased error rates when processing audio that deviates even slightly from the pristine data they were initially exposed to, highlighting a pressing need for techniques that enhance their robustness and adaptability to complex acoustic scenarios.

Existing benchmarks for audio large models (ALLMs) frequently operate under idealized conditions, presenting clean audio recordings devoid of the complexities inherent in real-world scenarios. This limits their ability to accurately assess an ALLM’s true capabilities when confronted with the unpredictable nature of everyday sound. Factors such as background noise – ranging from bustling cityscapes to the hum of appliances – reverberation in varied spaces, and the superposition of multiple sound events all contribute to acoustic challenges that current evaluation metrics often overlook. Consequently, a model achieving high scores on standard datasets may demonstrate significantly diminished performance when deployed in a noisy or reverberant environment, highlighting a critical gap between laboratory results and practical application. Truly robust audio understanding requires evaluation methodologies that rigorously test ALLMs across a diverse spectrum of challenging acoustic conditions, pushing the boundaries of their generalizability and uncovering vulnerabilities before real-world deployment.

The true potential of Audio Large Models (ALLMs) remains largely untapped due to a critical gap in evaluation methodology. Existing benchmarks often present idealized scenarios, failing to adequately assess performance under the unpredictable conditions of real-world audio – think bustling city streets, reverberant concert halls, or noisy home environments. Consequently, a pressing need exists for new, rigorously designed benchmarks that move beyond simple accuracy metrics and instead focus on robustness and generalizability. These benchmarks should intentionally introduce challenging acoustic conditions – variations in background noise, signal-to-noise ratios, and diverse recording qualities – to truly stress-test an ALLM’s ability to maintain performance across a spectrum of realistic, and often imperfect, inputs. Such comprehensive evaluation will not only expose the limitations of current models but also drive innovation toward more resilient and universally applicable audio understanding systems.

RSA-Bench: A Controlled Descent into Complexity

RSA-Bench utilizes advanced auditory scene simulation techniques to generate realistic acoustic environments for ALLM evaluation. These simulations are not simply recordings of existing spaces, but computationally constructed soundscapes modeled on principles of acoustic physics and spatial audio. The system accounts for factors such as sound propagation, reflection, diffraction, and reverberation, creating a high degree of acoustic fidelity. This approach allows for precise control over environmental parameters – including room dimensions, surface materials, and atmospheric conditions – enabling the creation of a wide range of controlled and repeatable acoustic scenarios that would be impractical or impossible to capture in real-world recordings.

RSA-Bench utilizes a variety of acoustic environments designed to assess ALLM performance in conditions exceeding those found in standard benchmark datasets. These environments include simulations of extreme weather events – encompassing conditions such as heavy rainfall, strong winds, and thunder – to evaluate robustness in challenging auditory conditions. Controlled classroom environments, featuring multiple speakers and realistic reverberation, test ALLM capabilities in complex, human-populated spaces. Finally, pastoral scenes, simulating open-field soundscapes with varying distances and obstructions, provide a unique evaluation of sound source localization and identification in less structured settings. These diverse scenarios collectively stress-test ALLMs across a broad range of acoustic complexities and real-world conditions.

RSA-Bench’s foundation in Acoustic Ecology prioritizes the accurate representation of sound environments as they naturally occur. This approach moves beyond isolated sound event detection to focus on the relationships between sounds and their surrounding context. By modeling sound propagation, reflection, and occlusion within realistically simulated environments, RSA-Bench captures complex sound interactions such as reverberation, masking, and the effects of terrain and foliage. This ecological validity is achieved through the incorporation of principles from soundscape ecology, bioacoustics, and geophysics, resulting in a benchmark that assesses ALLMs not just on identifying sounds, but on understanding them within their broader acoustic context.

The Perils of Preprocessing: A False Sense of Clarity

Preprocessing audio with noise reduction techniques is commonly employed to enhance the reliability of subsequent processing steps, particularly in challenging acoustic environments; however, these techniques are not without drawbacks. While intended to isolate the target signal, noise reduction algorithms can inadvertently introduce artifacts, altering the original audio characteristics and potentially degrading performance. These artifacts arise from the signal processing required to estimate and remove noise, and can manifest as distortions, reduced signal clarity, or the suppression of relevant acoustic features. The trade-off between noise suppression and artifact introduction is a critical consideration, as the presence of artifacts can negatively impact the accuracy of tasks reliant on subtle acoustic cues.

RNNoise and DeepFilterNet represent distinct approaches to noise reduction, each with inherent trade-offs. RNNoise, utilizing a recurrent neural network, excels at suppressing stationary noise by modeling speech characteristics and adapting to the signal; however, it can introduce musical noise or distortions in complex acoustic environments. DeepFilterNet, a convolutional neural network, employs a filter-based approach, offering potentially better preservation of signal transients but potentially less effective suppression of non-stationary noise. The optimal choice depends on the specific noise profile and the acceptable level of signal distortion; aggressive noise reduction with either method can introduce artifacts that negatively impact downstream tasks like speech recognition or audio analysis.

Despite the application of noise reduction preprocessing, audio-based reasoning models can be negatively impacted by perceptual phenomena such as spectral masking. Evaluations within a classroom environment, simulating K=4 concurrent noise sources, demonstrate this effect; utilizing the noisereduce algorithm resulted in a Word Error Rate (WER) of 55.74%. This performance is substantially inferior to the 14.63% WER achieved when processing the raw, unprocessed noisy audio, indicating that the noise reduction technique, while intended to improve clarity, actually degraded the model’s ability to accurately transcribe speech in this specific scenario.

Beyond Accuracy: A Glimpse into Systemic Fragility

RSA-Bench represents a significant advancement in evaluating the capabilities of Audio-Language Models (ALLMs) by moving beyond traditional accuracy metrics to assess performance across a broad spectrum of tasks. This benchmark isn’t limited to basic speech recognition; it delves into more complex cognitive functions, including discerning emotion from audio, identifying gender, and tackling mathematical reasoning problems presented through spoken language. Crucially, RSA-Bench also evaluates Speech Question Answering, requiring models to not only understand spoken queries but also formulate accurate responses. This diverse task set allows researchers to gain a holistic understanding of an ALLM’s strengths and weaknesses, identifying areas where further development is needed to achieve truly robust and versatile performance in real-world applications.

Rigorous evaluation using RSA-Bench highlights a critical vulnerability in current audio language models: performance degradation in noisy environments. Analysis demonstrates that as acoustic complexity increases – represented by noise levels K=0 to K=4 – Semantic Instruction (SI) accuracy plummets from a robust 65.5% to a mere 16.4%. This substantial decline indicates that models struggle to reliably interpret commands when faced with realistic auditory conditions, such as overlapping speech or background disturbances. The data underscores a need for improved noise robustness in automatic speech recognition and instruction following systems, suggesting that current models may overestimate performance in controlled laboratory settings and underperform in real-world applications.

Evaluations utilizing the RSA-Bench reveal striking disparities in the robustness of different AllM capabilities when confronted with increasingly complex auditory environments. While systems demonstrate a consistent ability to accurately identify gender-maintaining approximately 80% accuracy even under extreme outdoor noise conditions-performance on mathematical reasoning tasks degrades dramatically. As noise complexity increases – represented by the parameter K ranging from 0 to 4 – mathematical reasoning accuracy plummets from an initial 75% to a mere 6%. This suggests that seemingly advanced models, despite achieving high scores in controlled settings, struggle significantly with tasks requiring precise auditory processing and logical deduction when faced with realistic levels of environmental interference, highlighting a critical need for enhanced robustness in AllM development.

Traditional evaluation of speech instruction following often relies on metrics like Word Error Rate, which provide a limited view of a model’s true understanding and responsiveness. Researchers are now leveraging large language models (LLMs) as evaluators – essentially, employing an LLM-as-a-Judge – to move beyond simple error counts and assess the semantic correctness of responses. This approach allows for a more nuanced understanding of how well a model grasps the intent behind spoken instructions, even if the verbatim transcript contains minor discrepancies. By judging responses based on meaning and contextual relevance, LLM-as-a-Judge offers a richer and more human-aligned evaluation, revealing strengths and weaknesses that traditional metrics might miss and facilitating the development of more robust and intelligent speech-following systems.

The pursuit of pristine signal, as demonstrated by RSA-Bench’s findings, often resembles a fool’s errand. The study reveals that attempts to ‘clean’ audio with standard enhancement techniques frequently introduce new, and often more damaging, artifacts when faced with true acoustic complexity. This echoes a fundamental truth: systems aren’t built, they grow, and attempts to impose rigid order upon inherently chaotic environments are rarely successful. As Vinton Cerf observed, “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” The ‘magic’ fades quickly when confronted with the messy reality of real-world acoustic scenarios, revealing the limitations of even the most advanced Audio Large Models and the illusion of perfect signal processing. The benchmark isn’t a condemnation of the technology, but a prophecy of its eventual encounter with inevitable failure-a reminder that robustness isn’t achieved through suppression of noise, but through acceptance of it.

What’s Next?

RSA-Bench doesn’t reveal a failing of models so much as a predictable consequence of building them. Each carefully curated dataset, each meticulously engineered acoustic scenario, is a local maximum in a vastly more complex energy landscape. The benchmark isn’t a destination; it’s a map of the terrain where current approaches inevitably stumble. The observed degradation with standard enhancement techniques isn’t a bug, it’s a feature – a demonstration that attempting to force signal separation in a messy world is often more destructive than accepting the inherent ambiguity.

The field will likely see a proliferation of benchmarks, each attempting to define “real-world” with ever-increasing precision. This feels…inevitable, and largely futile. The true challenge isn’t creating harder tests, but abandoning the premise of testing altogether. Perhaps the focus should shift towards models that respond to uncertainty, that gracefully degrade rather than catastrophically fail. Models that admit their limitations, instead of attempting to erase them.

One anticipates a surge in “robustness” papers, followed by a corresponding increase in adversarial examples. The cycle will continue, each iteration revealing new failure modes. The only constant is the inevitability of decay. The question isn’t whether these systems will break, but when, and how beautifully they do so. No one writes prophecies after they come true, after all.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.10384.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-19 00:56