Can AI Truly Understand Finance?

Author: Denis Avetisyan


A new benchmark reveals the significant hurdles facing artificial intelligence when it comes to complex financial reasoning with real-world documents.

The distribution of FinMMDocR’s performance across financial scenarios, document lengths, and reasoning steps per question demonstrates a nuanced relationship between these factors in assessing complex financial documents.
The distribution of FinMMDocR’s performance across financial scenarios, document lengths, and reasoning steps per question demonstrates a nuanced relationship between these factors in assessing complex financial documents.

FinMMDocR assesses multimodal language models on scenario awareness, document understanding, and multi-step numerical computation in financial contexts.

Despite advances in multimodal large language models, robust financial reasoning-requiring nuanced document understanding and multi-step computation-remains a significant challenge. To address this, we introduce FinMMDocR: Benchmarking Financial Multimodal Reasoning with Scenario Awareness, Document Understanding, and Multi-Step Computation, a novel benchmark featuring complex, real-world financial problems embedded within visually rich documents. Our analysis reveals substantial performance gaps between current models and human experts, highlighting the need for improved reasoning capabilities in financial applications. Can future advancements in retrieval-augmented generation and model architectures bridge this gap and unlock the full potential of MLLMs in complex financial scenarios?


The Challenge of Nuance: Unveiling Financial Reasoning Gaps in MLLMs

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are gaining traction across various domains, yet their application to complex financial reasoning presents a significant challenge. These models, designed to process both textual and visual information, often falter when tasked with interpreting the nuances embedded within detailed financial documents. The difficulty stems not merely from the volume of data, but from the need to deeply understand intricate relationships, perform multi-step calculations, and synthesize information from diverse sources – skills that demand more than pattern recognition. While adept at identifying keywords or extracting data points, MLLMs frequently struggle with the contextual understanding and inferential reasoning necessary to accurately assess financial scenarios, highlighting a critical gap between current capabilities and the demands of real-world financial analysis.

Current evaluation benchmarks for Multimodal Large Language Models frequently stumble when confronted with the intricacies of real-world financial data. These assessments often prioritize simple question-answering or isolated fact retrieval, failing to adequately probe a model’s capacity to integrate information dispersed across lengthy, complex documents – such as financial reports, prospectuses, or regulatory filings. A significant limitation lies in the lack of emphasis on multi-step reasoning; many benchmarks do not require models to perform sequential calculations, compare data from different sources, or draw inferences based on nuanced contextual understanding. Consequently, high scores on existing benchmarks may not reliably translate to proficient performance in scenarios demanding genuine synthesis and analytical capabilities – highlighting a critical gap between benchmark success and practical financial reasoning competence.

Current evaluations of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in the financial domain prove inadequate, prompting the development of more robust assessment tools. Existing benchmarks frequently fail to mirror the complexities of real-world financial analysis, leading to artificially inflated performance scores. Recent studies reveal that even state-of-the-art MLLMs struggle to achieve accuracy levels exceeding 60% when confronted with realistic financial scenarios requiring nuanced document understanding and multi-step computation. This performance gap underscores the urgent need for a new benchmark – one designed to rigorously test a model’s ability to synthesize information from complex financial documents, perform accurate calculations, and ultimately, demonstrate true financial reasoning capabilities. Such a benchmark would not only provide a more realistic measure of current MLLM performance but also guide future research towards developing models capable of tackling the intricate challenges of financial analysis.

FinMMDocR effectively addresses complex, multi-step numerical reasoning tasks-such as determining shifts in China’s soybean import volumes from Brazil and the US amidst changing tariffs-by integrating real-world scenarios and visually-rich documents.
FinMMDocR effectively addresses complex, multi-step numerical reasoning tasks-such as determining shifts in China’s soybean import volumes from Brazil and the US amidst changing tariffs-by integrating real-world scenarios and visually-rich documents.

FinMMDocR: A Benchmark Designed for Financial Discernment

FinMMDocR is a benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in the context of financial document processing and reasoning. It moves beyond general long-document question answering by specifically focusing on tasks that require both understanding complex financial texts and performing accurate computations based on the information contained within those documents. The benchmark aims to provide a rigorous evaluation of an MLLM’s ability to extract relevant data, interpret financial terminology, and execute multi-step calculations to arrive at correct answers within realistic, real-world financial scenarios. This targeted approach allows for a granular assessment of MLLM performance in a domain demanding high precision and analytical skills.

FinMMDocR differentiates itself from existing Long Document Question Answering (LongDocQA) benchmarks by specifically concentrating on the complexities of financial documentation. This focus necessitates that models not only comprehend lengthy texts, but also accurately interpret the nuanced language common in financial reports, such as regulatory filings and investment statements. Crucially, the benchmark assesses a model’s capacity for precise calculation; many questions require performing arithmetic operations based on data extracted from the documents, moving beyond simple information retrieval to demand quantitative reasoning skills. This emphasis on both interpretive understanding and computational accuracy represents a significant advancement in evaluating multimodal large language models (MLLMs) within a realistic financial context.

The FinMMDocR benchmark utilizes financial documents with an average length of 50.8 pages, presenting a significant challenge to model processing capabilities. Each problem within the benchmark demands an average of 11 reasoning steps for completion, broken down into 5.3 information extraction steps and 5.7 calculation steps. This complexity necessitates robust document understanding and arithmetic proficiency from Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), exceeding the requirements of typical long-document question answering tasks and establishing a new standard for evaluating financial intelligence in AI systems.

FinMMDocR successfully navigates 12 complex financial scenarios across 9 document categories by demonstrating expert-level scenario awareness, robust document understanding, and the ability to perform multi-step computations, as evidenced by its performance against ground truth data (GT) and keyword (Kws) analysis.
FinMMDocR successfully navigates 12 complex financial scenarios across 9 document categories by demonstrating expert-level scenario awareness, robust document understanding, and the ability to perform multi-step computations, as evidenced by its performance against ground truth data (GT) and keyword (Kws) analysis.

Augmenting Intelligence: RAG and Advanced Techniques for Robust Reasoning

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses the limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) by supplementing their inherent knowledge with information retrieved from external sources. MLLMs, while possessing extensive pre-trained data, inevitably encounter scenarios where specific or up-to-date information is lacking. RAG mitigates this by first identifying relevant documents or data segments based on a user’s query and then providing these as context to the MLLM before response generation. This process allows the MLLM to ground its answers in verified information, improving accuracy, reducing hallucinations, and enabling responses to queries outside of its original training data. The retrieved context is concatenated with the prompt, effectively extending the MLLM’s knowledge base for that specific interaction.

VisRAG and Agentic RAG represent advancements beyond standard Retrieval-Augmented Generation by incorporating specialized retrieval and processing techniques. VisRAG specifically focuses on vision-based retrieval, enabling the system to identify and incorporate relevant visual information – such as charts or diagrams – alongside textual data. Agentic RAG employs a multi-agent framework, where distinct agents collaborate on tasks like query decomposition, information retrieval, and response synthesis. This collaborative approach allows for more complex reasoning and improved accuracy, particularly when dealing with ambiguous or multi-faceted queries. Both methods aim to overcome limitations of traditional RAG by dynamically adapting the retrieval process to the specific characteristics of the input and the desired output, resulting in enhanced flexibility and performance.

Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technology is critical for enabling Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to extract textual data from visual financial documents, such as scanned invoices, bank statements, and reports. These documents, often existing solely in image or PDF formats, are inaccessible to standard language models without prior conversion. OCR software analyzes the visual structure of these documents, identifies text, and converts it into machine-readable text. This process expands the range of data MLLMs can utilize, allowing for automated data extraction, analysis, and integration into financial workflows. Accuracy is paramount; modern OCR engines employ machine learning to improve character recognition rates and handle variations in font, layout, and image quality, minimizing errors in downstream MLLM processing.

Agentic RAG demonstrates comparable accuracy to other RAG methods while exhibiting a runtime composition significantly different from ColQwen2.5.
Agentic RAG demonstrates comparable accuracy to other RAG methods while exhibiting a runtime composition significantly different from ColQwen2.5.

FinMMDocR in Action: Defining a New Standard for Financial Intelligence

FinMMDocR serves as a discerning evaluator of multimodal large language models (MLLMs), effectively pinpointing those genuinely equipped for complex financial reasoning. Unlike conventional benchmarks, FinMMDocR doesn’t simply assess surface-level comprehension; it rigorously tests a model’s ability to analyze nuanced financial scenarios, extract critical numerical data from supporting documents, and arrive at precise calculations. This focused approach reveals significant performance disparities between MLLMs; some demonstrate a capacity for robust financial logic, while others struggle with even moderately complex tasks. By emphasizing scenario-driven problems and demanding a high degree of numerical accuracy – with an error tolerance of just 0.2% – FinMMDocR provides a reliable metric for distinguishing between models that merely appear capable and those possessing true financial intelligence.

Rigorous experimentation reveals that FinMMDocR offers a substantial advancement over current evaluation benchmarks for multi-modal large language models in the financial domain, specifically surpassing the capabilities of both FinQA and MMLongBench-Doc. These existing benchmarks often fail to adequately assess the nuanced reasoning required for real-world financial tasks, whereas FinMMDocR is designed to probe deeper understanding and analytical skills. The framework achieves this through complex, scenario-based questions demanding precise numerical calculations and interpretations of financial documents, providing a more granular and reliable measure of an MLLM’s true financial intelligence – a capability critically lacking in prior evaluation methods.

Current evaluations using the FinMMDocR benchmark reveal that OpenAI’s o4-mini-high model presently achieves the highest accuracy, scoring 58.0% in discerning complex financial reasoning tasks. This benchmark distinguishes itself by focusing on practical application; approximately 66.2% of the presented problems are scenario-driven, mirroring real-world financial decision-making. Crucially, FinMMDocR doesn’t simply assess conceptual understanding, but demands a high degree of numerical precision – answers are considered correct only within a remarkably tight error tolerance of 0.2%, signifying the benchmark’s rigor in evaluating quantitative financial skills.

FinMMDocR categorizes financial documents across a diverse range of classes, as shown in the distribution.
FinMMDocR categorizes financial documents across a diverse range of classes, as shown in the distribution.

The pursuit of robust financial reasoning, as demonstrated by FinMMDocR, necessitates a careful consideration of how models interpret and integrate diverse information sources. This benchmark doesn’t merely assess if a model can arrive at an answer, but how it navigates complex documents and multi-step computations. As David Marr eloquently stated, “A function is defined by what it does, not how it does it.” FinMMDocR, therefore, compels researchers to move beyond superficial performance metrics and focus on the underlying mechanisms that enable genuine understanding – particularly in scenarios demanding both document understanding and scenario awareness. The benchmark highlights the gap between current models and human expertise, underscoring the need for more elegant and functionally sound designs in multimodal large language models.

The Road Ahead

The introduction of FinMMDocR does not so much solve a problem as meticulously illuminate the chasm between current multimodal systems and genuine financial comprehension. The benchmark’s focus on scenario awareness, document understanding, and multi-step computation exposes a brittle quality in existing models-a tendency to mimic patterns rather than internalize principles. Current successes, it seems, rely heavily on superficial correlations, easily disrupted by even slight deviations from training data. The elegance of a truly robust system would lie in its capacity to reason from first principles, not merely recognize familiar configurations.

Future work must move beyond simply scaling parameters and feeding models more data. A deeper investigation into the architectural foundations of reasoning is needed. How can a system be built to not only process information from diverse sources-text, images, tables-but to synthesize it into a coherent, actionable understanding? The focus should shift from pattern recognition to the construction of internal models of financial systems, allowing for prediction and adaptation beyond the limitations of static datasets.

Ultimately, the measure of progress won’t be higher scores on benchmarks, but the emergence of systems capable of discerning why a particular financial decision is sound – or unsound. A system that whispers the logic of its conclusions, rather than shouting probabilities, is a system worthy of trust, and perhaps, even wisdom.


Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.24903.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

See also:

2026-01-02 11:48