Predictive Power: AI Meets Transformer Reliability

Author: Denis Avetisyan

New research demonstrates how integrating physics-based models with artificial intelligence significantly enhances the accuracy and trustworthiness of transformer health monitoring.

A Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) approach is proposed to model probabilistic spatiotemporal thermal transformations, integrating Bayesian inference with the underlying physics to quantify uncertainty and improve predictive capability.

This review explores Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Bayesian approaches for improved uncertainty quantification in transformer condition assessment.

Despite increasing reliance on data-driven approaches, accurate and reliable health assessment of critical power infrastructure remains a challenge. This is addressed in ‘Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Transformer Condition Monitoring — Part II: Physics-Informed Neural Networks and Uncertainty Quantification’, which explores integrating physical principles into machine learning models for improved transformer monitoring. The paper demonstrates that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), and their Bayesian extensions, enhance prediction accuracy and crucially, provide quantifiable uncertainty estimates under limited data. Could this framework pave the way for truly trustworthy and physics-aware digital twins for essential energy assets?

The Imperative of Thermal Prediction in Power Transformers

The unwavering reliability of power transformers is paramount to modern electrical grids, yet anticipating component failure remains a significant challenge. These massive devices experience intricate thermal behavior, influenced by fluctuating loads, ambient temperatures, and internal heat generation, creating a complex interplay difficult to model with precision. Unlike simpler systems, a transformer’s temperature isn’t uniform; hotspots develop due to localized insulation degradation and core losses, accelerating aging and potentially leading to catastrophic failure. Consequently, accurately forecasting remaining operational lifespan necessitates a deep understanding of these thermal dynamics, a task hampered by the non-linear nature of heat transfer and the difficulty in obtaining comprehensive real-time temperature data throughout the transformer’s core and windings.

Predictive maintenance of power transformers frequently relies on detailed modeling techniques, such as the Finite Element Method, to simulate thermal stress and identify potential weaknesses. However, these computationally intensive methods present significant challenges for real-world application. A full transformer model, accounting for complex geometries and material properties, can demand substantial processing power and time, hindering their use in dynamic, real-time monitoring. Furthermore, traditional FEM simulations are often static, struggling to adapt swiftly to fluctuating operational loads, ambient temperatures, or evolving component characteristics. This limitation restricts their ability to accurately forecast transformer health under varying conditions, creating a need for more agile and efficient predictive strategies that can respond to the ever-changing demands placed on the power grid.

Determining a power transformer’s Remaining Useful Life (RUL) presents a significant challenge because conventional predictive models often fail to adequately address the inherent uncertainties within these complex systems. Unlike deterministic simulations, a robust RUL assessment demands not just a prediction of the most likely outcome, but also a quantification of the range of possible futures-accounting for variations in load profiles, oil quality, and even subtle changes in ambient temperature. Without this uncertainty quantification-expressed through probabilistic methods-predictions can be dangerously overconfident, potentially leading to unexpected failures and costly downtime. Advanced techniques, such as Bayesian inference and ensemble modeling, are therefore crucial for generating reliable RUL estimates that reflect the true range of possibilities and facilitate informed maintenance decisions, moving beyond simple point predictions to a more nuanced understanding of transformer health.

Finite element method simulation reveals the distribution of reference temperatures.

Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Synthesis of Theory and Data

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) represent a departure from traditional neural network training by incorporating governing physical equations directly into the network’s architecture and loss function. Rather than solely learning from data, PINNs utilize partial differential equations (PDEs), such as the 1D Heat Diffusion Equation $\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \alpha \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}$ , to constrain the solution space. This embedding is achieved through automatic differentiation, allowing the network to compute derivatives of the predicted solution with respect to input variables and enforce the PDE as a residual within the loss function. Consequently, the network learns a solution that simultaneously satisfies the observed data and adheres to the underlying physical laws governing the system.

By incorporating underlying physical principles, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) demonstrate enhanced generalization capabilities, particularly in predicting $Spatiotemporal Temperature Distribution$ . This approach lessens the necessity for extensive training datasets, as the network is constrained by the known physics, effectively acting as a form of regularization. Consequently, PINNs can produce reliable predictions even with limited data, and the inherent physical constraints ensure that the solutions generated adhere to expected physical behaviors, improving the plausibility of results and reducing the risk of unrealistic or unstable predictions.

A Composite Loss Function is central to the functionality of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs). This function comprises multiple loss terms calculated concurrently during training. The first term minimizes the discrepancy between the neural network’s predictions and available observational data. Simultaneously, a physics-informed loss term quantifies the deviation of the network’s output from the governing physical equations, such as $\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \alpha \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}$ , ensuring adherence to established physical laws. Finally, boundary condition loss terms penalize violations of predefined conditions at the domain’s edges, enforcing consistency with the problem’s constraints. The weighted sum of these loss terms guides the network’s learning process, resulting in solutions that are both data-consistent and physically plausible.

Traditional neural networks primarily learn mappings from data through correlation, requiring substantial datasets to accurately represent complex phenomena. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) deviate from this approach by incorporating known physical laws and constraints directly into the network’s architecture and loss function. This integration allows PINNs to generalize more effectively with limited data, as the network is guided by established physical principles rather than solely relying on observed correlations. By embedding these laws – expressed as partial differential equations $\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \alpha \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2}$ – PINNs can provide physically consistent solutions, even in scenarios where data is sparse or unavailable, and can extrapolate beyond the training data domain with increased reliability.

This physics-informed neural network (PINN) predicts a solution <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> \hat{u} </span> by minimizing a total loss <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> L(\bm{\theta}) </span> comprised of a residual loss <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> L_{r}(\bm{\theta}) </span> calculated from temporal and spatial derivatives, all parameterized by network weights <span class="katex-eq" data-katex-display="false"> \bm{\theta} </span> and input spatio-temporal coordinates. — This physics-informed neural network (PINN) predicts a solution $\hat{u}$ by minimizing a total loss $L(\bm{\theta})$ comprised of a residual loss $L_{r}(\bm{\theta})$ calculated from temporal and spatial derivatives, all parameterized by network weights $\bm{\theta}$ and input spatio-temporal coordinates.

Bayesian Inference: Quantifying Uncertainty for Robust Prediction

Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) build upon Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) by representing the network’s weights as probability distributions rather than single values. This probabilistic treatment enables the quantification of two key uncertainty types: Aleatoric uncertainty, which represents inherent noise in the data, and Epistemic uncertainty, which reflects the model’s lack of knowledge due to limited or uncertain training data. By modeling weights as distributions – typically parameterized by a mean and variance – BNNs provide not just a single prediction but a predictive distribution, allowing for a more comprehensive assessment of prediction reliability. The variance of this distribution directly corresponds to the estimated uncertainty associated with each prediction, offering a measure of confidence in the model’s output.

Variational Inference (VI) provides a method for approximating the intractable posterior distribution of Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) weights. Direct calculation of the posterior – $p(w|D)$ , where $w$ represents the weights and $D$ the data – is often computationally prohibitive. VI addresses this by introducing a variational distribution $q(w)$ and minimizing the Kullback-Leibler (KL) Divergence – $KL(q(w) || p(w|D))$ – between this approximation and the true posterior. The KL Divergence quantifies the difference between two probability distributions; minimizing it effectively shapes $q(w)$ to resemble $p(w|D)$ as closely as possible, allowing for a tractable approximation of the posterior weight distribution without requiring direct sampling.

Quantifying prediction uncertainty is essential for reliable Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimations because it allows for assessment of the confidence level associated with each prediction. In practical applications, particularly those involving critical infrastructure or safety-sensitive systems, knowing not just what the predicted RUL is, but also how certain that prediction is, is paramount. High uncertainty indicates a greater potential for error and necessitates more frequent inspections, conservative maintenance scheduling, or implementation of mitigating strategies. Conversely, low uncertainty supports extended maintenance intervals and reduced operational costs. Therefore, integrating uncertainty quantification into RUL prediction enables risk-informed decision-making, facilitating proactive maintenance planning and minimizing the potential for unexpected failures and associated economic or safety consequences.

The integration of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) results in a predictive framework that simultaneously minimizes prediction error and quantifies the uncertainty associated with those predictions. This is achieved by treating network weights as probability distributions, enabling the estimation of both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. Empirical results demonstrate a reduction in both the mean prediction error and, critically, the uncertainty of that error; specifically, the variance of the predictions is demonstrably lower. These improvements are visualized in Figure 8, which illustrates the enhanced reliability and robustness of the combined PINN-BNN approach compared to traditional deterministic methods.

B-PINN predictions exhibit a mean error profile comparable to finite element method (FEM) solutions, alongside a quantifiable uncertainty associated with these errors.

Digital Twins and Beyond: Translating Theory into Pragmatic Application

Digital Twins are evolving beyond mere virtual replicas, becoming powerful tools for predictive maintenance in critical infrastructure like power transformers through the integration of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) and Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs). These networks allow for real-time health monitoring by fusing physics-based models with incoming sensor data, enabling the Digital Twin to not only reflect the transformer’s current state but also to anticipate potential failures. PINNs excel at incorporating known physical laws – such as those governing electromagnetic fields and heat transfer within a transformer – improving the accuracy and reliability of predictions, while BNNs quantify uncertainty, providing confidence intervals around diagnostic assessments. This combination facilitates proactive diagnostics, identifying subtle anomalies before they escalate into costly outages, and ultimately allows for optimized maintenance scheduling, reducing downtime and extending the lifespan of these vital components within the power grid.

Within the architecture of a Digital Twin, Convolutional Neural Networks are proving invaluable for interpreting acoustic signatures emanating from power transformers. These networks excel at pattern recognition within audio data, enabling the identification of subtle anomalies – such as partial discharges or core vibrations – that indicate developing faults. By continuously analyzing soundscapes captured by strategically placed sensors, the Digital Twin can move beyond traditional, scheduled inspections and provide a real-time assessment of transformer health. This acoustic monitoring, combined with other data streams, offers a more comprehensive and proactive diagnostic capability, ultimately enhancing grid reliability and reducing the risk of costly failures. The use of CNNs allows for the automated detection of conditions previously reliant on subjective human interpretation, delivering a quantifiable and objective evaluation of transformer performance.

Within the Digital Twin framework, Reinforcement Learning (RL) offers a powerful means of dynamically optimizing transformer energization-the process of bringing a transformer online-to minimize stress and extend its lifespan. Traditional energization procedures often rely on fixed settings, potentially exposing the transformer to inrush currents and magnetic inrush phenomena that accelerate degradation. RL algorithms, however, can learn optimal control policies through simulated interactions with the Digital Twin, adapting to varying grid conditions and transformer characteristics. By iteratively refining its actions based on rewards-such as reduced core saturation or minimized harmonic distortion-the RL agent identifies energization strategies that proactively mitigate these damaging effects. This adaptive control not only improves transformer reliability but also contributes to a more stable and efficient power grid by reducing the risk of operational failures and extending equipment life.

The convergence of physics-based modeling, data-driven learning, and virtual representations-as embodied by Digital Twins-represents a paradigm shift in power grid management. By integrating established engineering principles with the predictive power of neural networks and the immersive capabilities of virtual environments, infrastructure reliability and operational efficiency stand to be dramatically improved. This holistic methodology moves beyond reactive maintenance, enabling proactive diagnostics and optimized control strategies for critical assets like transformers. The resulting virtual replicas facilitate real-time monitoring, predictive failure analysis, and the testing of ‘what-if’ scenarios without disrupting live operations, ultimately fostering a more resilient and cost-effective power grid for the future.

The transformer heat diffusion model simulates heat transfer by defining heat sources and specifying boundary conditions.

The pursuit of robust transformer health monitoring, as detailed in this work, necessitates a departure from purely data-driven approaches. The integration of physics-informed neural networks, and particularly Bayesian extensions, strives for solutions possessing inherent correctness, not merely empirical success. This aligns perfectly with Barbara Liskov’s assertion: “It’s one thing to make a program work, and another thing to prove that it works.” The article’s focus on uncertainty quantification, achieved through B-PINNs, isn’t simply about refining predictions; it’s about acknowledging the limitations of the model and providing a verifiable measure of confidence-a cornerstone of provable correctness. If the thermal modelling feels like magic, the invariant hasn’t been revealed.

Future Directions

The pursuit of accurate digital twins for critical infrastructure, as demonstrated by this work on transformer health, inevitably encounters the limits of purely data-driven approaches. While the incorporation of physics through Physics-Informed Neural Networks offers a compelling path forward, the true challenge lies not merely in embedding known physical laws, but in rigorously addressing the inevitable discrepancies between model and reality. The quantification of model error, and its subsequent propagation through Bayesian frameworks, represents a necessary, though often overlooked, component of genuinely predictive capability.

Future research should prioritize the development of PINN architectures capable of handling increasingly complex, and potentially unknown, physics. The current reliance on pre-defined partial differential equations, while pragmatic, is ultimately restrictive. A fruitful avenue may lie in exploring differentiable programming paradigms that allow the network to discover governing equations from data, subject to fundamental physical constraints-a synthesis of empiricism and first principles.

Ultimately, the elegance of any such system will not be judged by its performance on benchmark datasets, but by the consistency of its boundaries. A model that accurately predicts when it will fail, rather than simply predicting a nominal operating state, is a model worthy of the name. The pursuit of such robustness demands a level of mathematical rigor often absent in the current landscape of machine learning, a landscape too often characterized by empirical success and a troubling lack of theoretical grounding.

Original article: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2512.22189.pdf

Contact the author: https://www.linkedin.com/in/avetisyan/

The Imperative of Thermal Prediction in Power Transformers

Physics-Informed Neural Networks: A Synthesis of Theory and Data

Bayesian Inference: Quantifying Uncertainty for Robust Prediction

Digital Twins and Beyond: Translating Theory into Pragmatic Application

Future Directions

See also: