5 Biggest Takeaways From Sean Combs: The Reckoning

by

The most disturbing parts of Alexandria Stapleton’s new Netflix documentary, Sean Combs: The Reckoning, aren’t necessarily about the accusations against the music mogul – allegations of assault, questionable business practices, and links to deaths. Instead, it’s the seemingly harmless footage of Combs on talk shows like Ellen and Rosie, in commercials, and at awards shows that’s truly unsettling. He projects a friendly image that those who knew him well say wasn’t genuine beyond first impressions. It’s shocking to realize, now more than a year after his arrest, just how pervasive Combs was in popular culture, making it hard to hold him accountable. Stapleton’s series effectively demonstrates that Combs used his wealth and influence to maintain a public image of innocence – an image that ultimately couldn’t be sustained.

The music executive was found not guilty of sex trafficking and racketeering, but convicted on two charges related to prostitution and sentenced to over four years in prison. However, the documentary series The Reckoning raises the question of who else bears responsibility for his actions and whether the public played a role in enabling his behavior. While much of the series covers well-known details of the case, it ultimately portrays a man driven by insatiable desires. Here are five key points from the series.

The hotel footage at the start of the episodes was obtained legally but ultimately doesn’t show us much

Before his arrest in September 2024, Sean Combs hired a videographer to film some behind-the-scenes footage. This included him arguing with his lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, about their legal strategy, getting ready for the day, and riding his bike around Manhattan. Combs’s team claims the footage was stolen before it was intended to be released, but Netflix and the filmmaker, Stapleton, say they obtained it legally and have the rights to use it. According to Stapleton, Combs has a long-standing habit of filming himself, and the footage came to them naturally because of this.

The strong response from Combs’s team hints that even though the footage itself isn’t very exciting, it holds some importance. While it’s not particularly scandalous or groundbreaking, it does offer a glimpse into his life. If Combs was indeed filmed extensively throughout his life, he’s clearly aware of how to control his image on camera. His conversations with Agnifilo are especially insightful, as they suggest he feels he’s nearing the end of his career or life.

Former associates love talking about how bad Combs was and is at making music

One of the few amusing parts of the documentary Sean Combs: The Reckoning is hearing people who used to work with Combs talk about his ambition to be a rapper, despite lacking the ability. When asked about Combs’s rapping skills, rapper Mark Curry bluntly stated, “Sucks.” R&B artist Al B. Sure! agreed, saying Combs had “zero musical talent” and knew very little about R&B. Curry explained that Combs would often ask him to be present during recording sessions specifically for honest feedback. Curry would tell him directly when something wasn’t working, saying things like, “That’s not it…it sucked, it doesn’t sound good, and it makes no sense.”

We’ll probably never know for sure if Combs was involved in Tupac Shakur’s death

The second episode, titled “What Goes Up Must Come Down,” focuses heavily on the deaths of Tupac and Biggie Smalls, exploring the possibility of Sean “Diddy” Combs’ involvement. Greg Kading, a former LAPD detective who worked on the Tupac Shakur murder investigation, explains the challenges in identifying a single person responsible for the killings.

Gang-related crimes are notoriously hard to solve because people involved are often unwilling to talk to the police. However, investigator Kading had extensive conversations with Duane Keith Davis, known as Keffe D, who is now accused in the death of Tupac Shakur. Davis claims he spoke with Sean Combs on several occasions, and alleges Combs once said he would pay any price to have Shakur and Suge Knight harmed. While Combs has never been charged in connection with the case, Davis now says his previous statements to the LAPD were made under pressure, which casts further doubt on what is known about the investigation.

The jurors are still divided on how they feel about Combs

Following the May 2025 verdict – where Combs was cleared of some charges but convicted on others – it seems the jurors remain conflicted about their decision and his behavior. One former Combs employee, Capricorn Clark, claims the jury didn’t believe the evidence presented. A juror agrees, adding that many on the panel seemed impressed by Combs, even starstruck. Another juror explains that because the events happened so long ago, they began to question the credibility of key witnesses like Clark and Cassie Ventura. This creates a difficult viewing experience, balancing the obvious pain Clark feels when recalling the trial with understanding how the jury reached its conclusions.

An explanation for why 50 Cent is so involved

Curtis Jackson, also known as 50 Cent, is credited at the end of each episode. He explained to ABC News that remaining silent would be seen as acceptance of Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ actions. Jackson and Combs have been rivals since 2006, when Jackson publicly accused Combs of involvement in the death of the Notorious B.I.G. Jackson stated in October 2024 that he’s been challenging Combs for ten years, and his executive producer credit on this project demonstrates that his perspective is finally being recognized.

Read More

2025-12-04 01:55