🤑 Banks Go Crypto: Riskless Fun or Financial Fiasco? 🤑

by

Ah, the marvellous world of money-making mischief! The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (what a mouthful, eh? 🍭) has declared that national banks can now dabble in cryptocurrency trades as “riskless principals.” 🕶️ No need to hold those pesky assets on their balance sheets-how utterly convenient! This whimsical move brings traditional banks one giant leap closer to offering regulated crypto brokerage services. Hurrah for progress! 🎉

In a letter so interpretive it could rival a Shakespearean sonnet, the regulator chirped that banks may now play both sides of the crypto fence, acting as principals in a trade with one customer while simultaneously hedging their bets with another. 🦸‍♂️🦹‍♀️ A structure, they say, that mirrors the oh-so-serious “riskless principal activity” in traditional markets. How delightfully dull! 😴

“Several applicants have discussed how conducting riskless principal crypto-asset transactions would benefit their proposed bank’s customers and business, including by offering additional services in a growing market,” the document trills, as if anyone needed more ways to spend their hard-earned cash. 💸

According to the OCC, this grand scheme will allow customers to “transact crypto-assets through a regulated bank, as compared to non-regulated or less regulated options.” Because who doesn’t love a bit of red tape with their digital coins? 🎀

But fear not, dear reader! The letter also reminds banks to confirm the legal permissibility of any crypto activity and ensure it aligns with their chartered powers. 🕵️‍♂️ Institutions must maintain procedures for monitoring operational, compliance, and market risks-because nothing says “fun” like a good old-fashioned risk assessment! 📊

“The main risk in riskless principal transactions is counterparty credit risk (in particular, settlement risk),” the letter warns, as if anyone needed a reminder that even “riskless” ventures can go spectacularly wrong. 🤪 “Managing counterparty credit risk is integral to the business of banking, and banks are experienced in managing this risk,” it adds, with a wink and a nudge. 😉

The agency’s guidance cites 12 U.S.C. § 24, which permits national banks to conduct riskless principal transactions as part of the “business of banking.” 🏦 And let’s not forget the distinction between crypto assets that qualify as securities-because nothing screams excitement like regulatory classifications! 📜

This interpretive letter-a nonbinding guidance that outlines the agency’s view of which activities national banks may conduct under existing law-was issued a day after the head of the OCC, Jonathan Gould, proclaimed that crypto firms seeking a federal bank charter should be treated the same as traditional financial institutions. 🌟 According to Gould, the banking system has the “capacity to evolve,” and there is “no justification for considering digital assets differently” than traditional banks, which have offered custody services “electronically for decades.” 🖥️ How groundbreaking! 🚀

From ‘Choke Point 2.0’ to Pro-Crypto Policy 🎭

Under the Biden administration, some industry groups and lawmakers accused US regulators of pursuing an “Operation Choke Point 2.0” approach that increased supervisory pressure on banks and firms interacting with crypto. 🤔 But lo and behold, since President Trump took office in January after pledging to support the sector, the federal government has done a complete about-face, adopting a more permissive posture toward digital asset activity. 🌪️

So, there you have it, folks! Banks are now crypto-curious, and the world of finance is about to get a whole lot more interesting-or chaotic. 🌪️🤑 Stay tuned for the next thrilling installment of “Adventures in Banking”! 🎬

Read More

2025-12-09 23:56