As a long-term crypto investor who has witnessed the meteoric rise and fall of several players in this industry, I’m disheartened by the latest developments surrounding Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) and the FTX scandal. The allegations of misappropriating customer funds for political donations are not only a breach of trust but also potentially illegal.


Sam Bankman-Fried, the former head of the collapsed crypto exchange FTX, has found himself at the center of a massive financial scandal worth billions. Previously regarded as a prominent figure in the crypto world, he is now under investigation for allegedly misappropriating company funds towards political contributions.

As a crypto investor, I came across some disturbing news reported by The Wall Street Journal (WSJ). According to their investigation, emails they’ve obtained suggest that the family of a previously convicted executive may have had an extensive involvement in certain business dealings. This revelation could potentially lead to legal complications and uncertainty in the future.

More Legal Troubles For SBF and Family

Newly disclosed emails from the Wall Street Journal indicate that Sam Bankman-Fried’s family oversaw more than $100 million in political donations. The funds, reportedly sourced from FTX customers’ accounts, have ignited fears of impending legal action due to potential election influence concerns.

Joe Bankman, the father of SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried), is reportedly seen providing financial advice concerning political donations, according to the emails. Evidence indicates his active role in the questionable transactions. Additionally, Barbara Fried, SBF’s mother, and Gabriel Bankman-Fried, his brother, are accused of overseeing the distribution of funds to various political campaigns.

I, serving as an analyst, can rephrase that statement as follows: As a co-founder of Mind the Gap, Barbara is reportedly responsible for allocating resources towards progressive organizations. Simultaneously, Gabriel concentrates his efforts on initiatives aimed at preventing the spread of pandemics.

David Mason, a past chair of the Federal Election Commission, pointed out that Joe Bankman’s participation might result in potential legal consequences under campaign financing regulations due to “compelling proof” of his knowledge about the illegal straw-donor arrangement.

As a researcher, I’ve come across statements from a representative of SBF’s father, who is a law professor at Stanford University, asserting that they hold no information about any supposed campaign finance infractions.

FTX Execs’ Role in Political Donation Fraud

According to the Wall Street Journal’s investigation, Ryan Salame and Nishad Singh, two ex-FTX executives, were also named in the political donation scandal that implicated SBF (Bankman-Fried) and his family.

Salame and Bankman-Fried have confessed to their roles in the clandestine straw-donor scheme. According to the prosecution, Salame funneled money to Republican campaigns to conceal his association with Bankman-Fried, while Singh supported Democratic candidates.

Previously announced, Salame – a former co-CEO of FTX Digital Markets – has been sentenced to serve 7.5 years in prison followed by three years of supervised release. He is required to forfeit $6 million and make restitution payments exceeding $5 million.

Read More

2024-07-06 02:54